<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legal Causation as an Answer to Deconstruction?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/01/19/legal-causation-as-an-answer-to-deconstruction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/01/19/legal-causation-as-an-answer-to-deconstruction/</link>
	<description>An overly eclectic, likely inconsequent[ial], and blatantly fo[w]l blog on life, family, literature, law, and religion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:11:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/01/19/legal-causation-as-an-answer-to-deconstruction/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/01/19/legal-causation-as-an-answer-to-deconstruction/#comment-326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John F, your essay brings to mind the pragmatic theory of meaning, whereby the meaning of a statement is a function of its practical consequences or, as William James put it, its &quot;cash value.&quot;  No doubt Clark could expound at length on this theme.&#160;

&lt;A&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A&gt;&lt;/A&gt;Posted by&lt;A&gt;&lt;B&gt; &lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.blogger.com/r?http%3A%2F%2Fmormoninquiry.typepad.com&quot; TITLE=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dave&lt;/A&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John F, your essay brings to mind the pragmatic theory of meaning, whereby the meaning of a statement is a function of its practical consequences or, as William James put it, its &#8220;cash value.&#8221;  No doubt Clark could expound at length on this theme.&#160;</p>
<p><a></a><a></a>Posted by<a><b> </b></a><a HREF="http://www.blogger.com/r?http%3A%2F%2Fmormoninquiry.typepad.com" TITLE="" rel="nofollow">Dave</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
