<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private Property in Law I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/</link>
	<description>An overly eclectic, likely inconsequent[ial], and blatantly fo[w]l blog on life, family, literature, law, and religion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:12:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john f.</title>
		<link>http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-8213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john f.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-8213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael:

I would advise not wasting valuable time taking issue with ed enochs.  He was an Evangelical creedalist troll who visited numerous LDS blogs a couple of years ago and cut and pasted long passages into blog comments (like the one left here) that had nothing at all to do with the original post.

He also engaged in some bizarre self-promoting behavior on some of the major LDS blogs back in 2005 in which he would have others from his ministry (i.e. the comments were left from the same IP address) post long comments praising ed enochs saying things like &quot;Oh that ed enochs is such a bright young man&quot; and things like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael:</p>
<p>I would advise not wasting valuable time taking issue with ed enochs.  He was an Evangelical creedalist troll who visited numerous LDS blogs a couple of years ago and cut and pasted long passages into blog comments (like the one left here) that had nothing at all to do with the original post.</p>
<p>He also engaged in some bizarre self-promoting behavior on some of the major LDS blogs back in 2005 in which he would have others from his ministry (i.e. the comments were left from the same IP address) post long comments praising ed enochs saying things like &#8220;Oh that ed enochs is such a bright young man&#8221; and things like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-8207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-8207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found Ed&#039;s comment from two years ago quite interesting....not only regarding the points he got surprisingly right (there are a few claims I question), but by his comment at the end: &quot;I must stand for the truth of God irrespective of the consequences&quot;.  Good for him--I hope he realizes that this is exactly what the adherents to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is doing as well!  If that is a proclamation for him in an effort to diffuse any type of offense that may be taken, shouldn&#039;t he swallow his own pill?

Thank goodness a young prophet had the courage and faith to declare plainly what God directed him to; the general populace has always been offended and angered when the prophets speak plainly against the popular practices of the day--I think of Jeremiah and Isaiah as examples, since I have read in those books most recently.  

Thank goodness God restored the fulness of His gospel on earth for all!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found Ed&#8217;s comment from two years ago quite interesting&#8230;.not only regarding the points he got surprisingly right (there are a few claims I question), but by his comment at the end: &#8220;I must stand for the truth of God irrespective of the consequences&#8221;.  Good for him&#8211;I hope he realizes that this is exactly what the adherents to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is doing as well!  If that is a proclamation for him in an effort to diffuse any type of offense that may be taken, shouldn&#8217;t he swallow his own pill?</p>
<p>Thank goodness a young prophet had the courage and faith to declare plainly what God directed him to; the general populace has always been offended and angered when the prophets speak plainly against the popular practices of the day&#8211;I think of Jeremiah and Isaiah as examples, since I have read in those books most recently.  </p>
<p>Thank goodness God restored the fulness of His gospel on earth for all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshua madson</title>
		<link>http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-8031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshua madson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-8031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you it would be helpful to discuss usufruct property versus amassing property we dont use. Locke and others are much closer to this than our modern conceptions of property in a capitalist system]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you it would be helpful to discuss usufruct property versus amassing property we dont use. Locke and others are much closer to this than our modern conceptions of property in a capitalist system</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-6211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-6211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Evangelicals Cannot Support Joseph Smith and the&lt;br/&gt;Mormon Church&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;by Ed Enochs&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;“Test all things, hold fast to the truth”&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(1 Thess. 5:21)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I love my Mormon friends with all my heart, but I&lt;br/&gt;cannot support their teachings and practices.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Over the last twenty years I have had many&lt;br/&gt;discussions with members of the Mormon Church and one&lt;br/&gt;of the consistent themes I have heard from my Mormon&lt;br/&gt;friends is that they feel that have been constantly&lt;br/&gt;persecuted by Evangelicals.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This persecution sentiment that Mormons feel towards&lt;br/&gt;Evangelicals is very deep and at times justified when&lt;br/&gt;you study the history of the Mormon Church in America.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The entire early history of the Mormon Church tells of&lt;br/&gt;how the Mormon Church had to move from one state to&lt;br/&gt;another and finally make the trek from Illinois to&lt;br/&gt;Utah on account of persecution.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As an Evangelical who has had much exposure to the&lt;br/&gt;culture of the Church of Jesus Christ Latter Day&lt;br/&gt;Saints, I believe this persecution of the Mormons is&lt;br/&gt;very sad and unfortunate. Especially since the US&lt;br/&gt;Constitution is supposed to guarantee the freedom of&lt;br/&gt;religious expression irrespective of the seeming&lt;br/&gt;oddity of a given religious group by the majority.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The first Amendment to the US Constitution clearly&lt;br/&gt;says,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;“Congress shall make no law respecting an&lt;br/&gt;establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free&lt;br/&gt;exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,&lt;br/&gt;or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably&lt;br/&gt;to assemble, and to petition the government for a&lt;br/&gt;redress of grievances.” &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So, as an American Evangelical who believes in a&lt;br/&gt;strict interpretation of the US Constitution, I&lt;br/&gt;believe in the right of the Mormon Church to both&lt;br/&gt;exist and proselytize others in the United States,&lt;br/&gt;irrespective of whether or not I agree with the&lt;br/&gt;teachings and practices of a given religious group, as&lt;br/&gt;in the case of the Mormon Church.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So I support the right for the Mormon Church to exist&lt;br/&gt;in the United States and teach their doctrines.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, I believe that many Mormons do not really&lt;br/&gt;understand much about the Evangelical faith and that&lt;br/&gt;Evangelicals are deeply offended by the LDS notion&lt;br/&gt;that they alone are the true Church of Jesus Christ on&lt;br/&gt;the earth and that God called Joseph Smith to restore&lt;br/&gt;the Gospel. In fact Joseph Smith had these harsh words&lt;br/&gt;for Methodist, Baptist, Presbyterian and other members&lt;br/&gt;of the Evangelical church,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;“I was answered that I must join none of them, for&lt;br/&gt;they were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed&lt;br/&gt;me said that all their creeds were an abomination in&lt;br/&gt;his sight; that those professors were all corrupt;&lt;br/&gt;that: “they draw near to me with their lips, but their&lt;br/&gt;hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the&lt;br/&gt;commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but&lt;br/&gt;they deny the power thereof.”&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Joseph Smith: History 1:19&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Many Mormons have personally told me that they believe&lt;br/&gt;the LDS church alone is the true Church of Jesus&lt;br/&gt;Christ and that they alone possess the authority of&lt;br/&gt;Jesus Christ to baptize and administer the Lord’s&lt;br/&gt;supper, in effect saying that God does not honor the&lt;br/&gt;Evangelical Church’s teachings and ordinances.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Irrespective of how nicely we are told by our Mormon&lt;br/&gt;neighbor that they love us, the entire Mormon Church&lt;br/&gt;is a testimony to the fact that they believe the true&lt;br/&gt;Church of Christ fell away and that they have come to&lt;br/&gt;restore the Gospel of Christ, even though the&lt;br/&gt;Evangelical Christian Church flourished across&lt;br/&gt;American during the life of Joseph Smith.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So, when my Mormon neighbor tells me of the very&lt;br/&gt;unfortunate history of persecution of Mormons by&lt;br/&gt;Evangelicals, I think it is very wrong what has&lt;br/&gt;happened to them, but in part I can understand why;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In 1830, a young man named Joseph Smith with a&lt;br/&gt;criminal record and bad character testimony as the&lt;br/&gt;recently rediscovered arrest records demonstrate,&lt;br/&gt;arose in upstate New York and said that he received a&lt;br/&gt;series of revelations from God and angelic beings&lt;br/&gt;telling him that he was the anointed prophet of the&lt;br/&gt;world who was called by God to restore the true Church&lt;br/&gt;and Gospel of Christ to the earth since it fell away.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Joseph Smith proclaimed that the Evangelical Church&lt;br/&gt;was corrupt and that all its practices, doctrines and&lt;br/&gt;creeds were corrupt and that the Evangelicals&lt;br/&gt;worshiped wrongly.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Joseph Smith said that the Scriptures were not&lt;br/&gt;complete and that God had also inspired the Book of&lt;br/&gt;Mormon, the Pearl of Great Price and Doctrines and&lt;br/&gt;Covenants on the same level of authority as the Bible.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Joseph Smith contradicted almost all Evangelical&lt;br/&gt;doctrines concerning God, the Bible, Salvation, and&lt;br/&gt;eternal life.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Joseph Smith clearly taught that God the Father was&lt;br/&gt;once a man who was exalted to godhood by faithfulness&lt;br/&gt;to the Mormon doctrine of eternal progression. Joseph&lt;br/&gt;Smith also clearly taught that men can become God’s in&lt;br/&gt;the same way by faithfulness to the Mormon Gospel.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The Mormon Prophet and Founder Joseph Smith wrote,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;“God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted&lt;br/&gt;man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens! That is the&lt;br/&gt;great secret. If the veil were rent today, and the&lt;br/&gt;great God who holds this world in its orbit, and who&lt;br/&gt;upholds all worlds and all things by His power, was to&lt;br/&gt;make himself visible, — I say, if you were to see him&lt;br/&gt;today, you would see him like a man in form — like&lt;br/&gt;yourselves in all the person, image, and very form as&lt;br/&gt;a man; for Adam was created in the very fashion, image&lt;br/&gt;and likeness of God, and received instruction from,&lt;br/&gt;and walked, talked and conversed with Him, as one man&lt;br/&gt;talks and communes with another.”&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In order to understand the subject of the dead, for&lt;br/&gt;consolation of those who mourn for the loss of their&lt;br/&gt;friends, it is necessary we should understand the&lt;br/&gt;character and being of God and how He came to be so;&lt;br/&gt;for I am going to tell you how God came to be God. We&lt;br/&gt;have imagined and supposed that God was God from all&lt;br/&gt;eternity. I will refute that idea, and take away the&lt;br/&gt;veil, so that you may see.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;“Here, then, is eternal life — to know the only wise&lt;br/&gt;and true god; and you have got to learn how to be gods&lt;br/&gt;yourselves, and to be kings and priests to God, the&lt;br/&gt;same as all gods have done before you, namely, by&lt;br/&gt;going from one small degree to another, and from a&lt;br/&gt;small capacity to a great one; from grace to grace,&lt;br/&gt;from exaltation to exaltation, until you attain to the&lt;br/&gt;resurrection of the dead, and are able to dwell in&lt;br/&gt;everlasting burnings, and to sit in glory, as do those&lt;br/&gt;who sit enthroned in everlasting power.”&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;King Follet Discourse by Joseph Smith&lt;br/&gt;General Conference, April 1844&lt;br/&gt;History of the Church, vol. 6&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It also a well documented fact that Joseph Smith was a&lt;br/&gt;mason and a polygamist, taking several women including&lt;br/&gt;two sisters and a mother and her daughter as his wife.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I will always love my Mormon friends but I will never&lt;br/&gt;support their teachings. I must stand for the truth of&lt;br/&gt;God irrespective of the consequences.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why Evangelicals Cannot Support Joseph Smith and the<br />Mormon Church</p>
<p>by Ed Enochs</p>
<p>“Test all things, hold fast to the truth”</p>
<p>(1 Thess. 5:21)</p>
<p>I love my Mormon friends with all my heart, but I<br />cannot support their teachings and practices.</p>
<p>Over the last twenty years I have had many<br />discussions with members of the Mormon Church and one<br />of the consistent themes I have heard from my Mormon<br />friends is that they feel that have been constantly<br />persecuted by Evangelicals.</p>
<p>This persecution sentiment that Mormons feel towards<br />Evangelicals is very deep and at times justified when<br />you study the history of the Mormon Church in America.</p>
<p>The entire early history of the Mormon Church tells of<br />how the Mormon Church had to move from one state to<br />another and finally make the trek from Illinois to<br />Utah on account of persecution.</p>
<p>As an Evangelical who has had much exposure to the<br />culture of the Church of Jesus Christ Latter Day<br />Saints, I believe this persecution of the Mormons is<br />very sad and unfortunate. Especially since the US<br />Constitution is supposed to guarantee the freedom of<br />religious expression irrespective of the seeming<br />oddity of a given religious group by the majority.</p>
<p>The first Amendment to the US Constitution clearly<br />says,</p>
<p>“Congress shall make no law respecting an<br />establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free<br />exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,<br />or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably<br />to assemble, and to petition the government for a<br />redress of grievances.” </p>
<p>So, as an American Evangelical who believes in a<br />strict interpretation of the US Constitution, I<br />believe in the right of the Mormon Church to both<br />exist and proselytize others in the United States,<br />irrespective of whether or not I agree with the<br />teachings and practices of a given religious group, as<br />in the case of the Mormon Church.</p>
<p>So I support the right for the Mormon Church to exist<br />in the United States and teach their doctrines.</p>
<p>However, I believe that many Mormons do not really<br />understand much about the Evangelical faith and that<br />Evangelicals are deeply offended by the LDS notion<br />that they alone are the true Church of Jesus Christ on<br />the earth and that God called Joseph Smith to restore<br />the Gospel. In fact Joseph Smith had these harsh words<br />for Methodist, Baptist, Presbyterian and other members<br />of the Evangelical church,</p>
<p>“I was answered that I must join none of them, for<br />they were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed<br />me said that all their creeds were an abomination in<br />his sight; that those professors were all corrupt;<br />that: “they draw near to me with their lips, but their<br />hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the<br />commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but<br />they deny the power thereof.”</p>
<p>Joseph Smith: History 1:19</p>
<p>Many Mormons have personally told me that they believe<br />the LDS church alone is the true Church of Jesus<br />Christ and that they alone possess the authority of<br />Jesus Christ to baptize and administer the Lord’s<br />supper, in effect saying that God does not honor the<br />Evangelical Church’s teachings and ordinances.</p>
<p>Irrespective of how nicely we are told by our Mormon<br />neighbor that they love us, the entire Mormon Church<br />is a testimony to the fact that they believe the true<br />Church of Christ fell away and that they have come to<br />restore the Gospel of Christ, even though the<br />Evangelical Christian Church flourished across<br />American during the life of Joseph Smith.</p>
<p>So, when my Mormon neighbor tells me of the very<br />unfortunate history of persecution of Mormons by<br />Evangelicals, I think it is very wrong what has<br />happened to them, but in part I can understand why;</p>
<p>In 1830, a young man named Joseph Smith with a<br />criminal record and bad character testimony as the<br />recently rediscovered arrest records demonstrate,<br />arose in upstate New York and said that he received a<br />series of revelations from God and angelic beings<br />telling him that he was the anointed prophet of the<br />world who was called by God to restore the true Church<br />and Gospel of Christ to the earth since it fell away.</p>
<p>Joseph Smith proclaimed that the Evangelical Church<br />was corrupt and that all its practices, doctrines and<br />creeds were corrupt and that the Evangelicals<br />worshiped wrongly.</p>
<p>Joseph Smith said that the Scriptures were not<br />complete and that God had also inspired the Book of<br />Mormon, the Pearl of Great Price and Doctrines and<br />Covenants on the same level of authority as the Bible.</p>
<p>Joseph Smith contradicted almost all Evangelical<br />doctrines concerning God, the Bible, Salvation, and<br />eternal life.</p>
<p>Joseph Smith clearly taught that God the Father was<br />once a man who was exalted to godhood by faithfulness<br />to the Mormon doctrine of eternal progression. Joseph<br />Smith also clearly taught that men can become God’s in<br />the same way by faithfulness to the Mormon Gospel.</p>
<p>The Mormon Prophet and Founder Joseph Smith wrote,</p>
<p>“God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted<br />man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens! That is the<br />great secret. If the veil were rent today, and the<br />great God who holds this world in its orbit, and who<br />upholds all worlds and all things by His power, was to<br />make himself visible, — I say, if you were to see him<br />today, you would see him like a man in form — like<br />yourselves in all the person, image, and very form as<br />a man; for Adam was created in the very fashion, image<br />and likeness of God, and received instruction from,<br />and walked, talked and conversed with Him, as one man<br />talks and communes with another.”</p>
<p>In order to understand the subject of the dead, for<br />consolation of those who mourn for the loss of their<br />friends, it is necessary we should understand the<br />character and being of God and how He came to be so;<br />for I am going to tell you how God came to be God. We<br />have imagined and supposed that God was God from all<br />eternity. I will refute that idea, and take away the<br />veil, so that you may see.</p>
<p>“Here, then, is eternal life — to know the only wise<br />and true god; and you have got to learn how to be gods<br />yourselves, and to be kings and priests to God, the<br />same as all gods have done before you, namely, by<br />going from one small degree to another, and from a<br />small capacity to a great one; from grace to grace,<br />from exaltation to exaltation, until you attain to the<br />resurrection of the dead, and are able to dwell in<br />everlasting burnings, and to sit in glory, as do those<br />who sit enthroned in everlasting power.”</p>
<p>King Follet Discourse by Joseph Smith<br />General Conference, April 1844<br />History of the Church, vol. 6</p>
<p>It also a well documented fact that Joseph Smith was a<br />mason and a polygamist, taking several women including<br />two sisters and a mother and her daughter as his wife.</p>
<p>I will always love my Mormon friends but I will never<br />support their teachings. I must stand for the truth of<br />God irrespective of the consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-6210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 03:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-6210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Biblical property had a fee tail -- you couldn&#039;t alienate it from your family for any significant period of time.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Kind of contrary to the heart of the American rule ...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I do think that many people read into complex works, like the Bible or the Book of Mormon, their own needs and thoughts, like an ink blot.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But Biblical property laws create a type of slow economy alien to us, and eventually alien to the people who were charged with observing them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biblical property had a fee tail &#8212; you couldn&#8217;t alienate it from your family for any significant period of time.</p>
<p>Kind of contrary to the heart of the American rule &#8230;</p>
<p>I do think that many people read into complex works, like the Bible or the Book of Mormon, their own needs and thoughts, like an ink blot.</p>
<p>But Biblical property laws create a type of slow economy alien to us, and eventually alien to the people who were charged with observing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john f.</title>
		<link>http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-6209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john f.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 05:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-6209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is certainly an irony in the whole story. The fact is that there is little doubt that the Bible influenced the American (Lockean) notion of private property, or, in other words that people (including Locke and Blackstone) sought support for the notion in the Bible. But that doesn&#039;t really mean that private property really is actually &lt;i&gt;biblical&lt;/i&gt; in the sense that it is scripturally prescribed. The above analysis merely shows the heavy biblical influence on the civil right of private property; it remains to be seen if God prefers this to other methods. In later installments I hope to explore Book of Mormon approaches as well as latter-day insights. But the wind is slightly out of my sails now because I see that Nate Oman is already doing this right now over at T&amp;S: &lt;br/&gt;See&lt;br/&gt;http://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php?p=2266&lt;br/&gt;and&lt;br/&gt;http://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php?p=2278]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is certainly an irony in the whole story. The fact is that there is little doubt that the Bible influenced the American (Lockean) notion of private property, or, in other words that people (including Locke and Blackstone) sought support for the notion in the Bible. But that doesn&#8217;t really mean that private property really is actually <i>biblical</i> in the sense that it is scripturally prescribed. The above analysis merely shows the heavy biblical influence on the civil right of private property; it remains to be seen if God prefers this to other methods. In later installments I hope to explore Book of Mormon approaches as well as latter-day insights. But the wind is slightly out of my sails now because I see that Nate Oman is already doing this right now over at T&#038;S: <br />See<br /><a href="http://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php?p=2266" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php?p=2266</a><br />and<br /><a href="http://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php?p=2278" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesandseasons.org/index.php?p=2278</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john f.</title>
		<link>http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-6208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john f.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 04:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-6208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, I&#039;ve at least restored the footnotes to the maintext, but I haven&#039;t yet had time to hyperlink them--sorry for any inconvenience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;ve at least restored the footnotes to the maintext, but I haven&#8217;t yet had time to hyperlink them&#8211;sorry for any inconvenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john f.</title>
		<link>http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-6207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john f.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 19:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abev.wordpress.com/2005/05/01/private-property-in-law-i/#comment-6207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops! I just realized that the formatting for the footnotes in the maintext failed. Sorry if anyone was confused by this. I will try to fix the formatting this evening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! I just realized that the formatting for the footnotes in the maintext failed. Sorry if anyone was confused by this. I will try to fix the formatting this evening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
