This is interesting! Take a look at how these two seemingly IDENTICAL situations are described VERY differently by the press:
Perhaps the journalist knew something we didn’t- perhaps not. It’s still interesting.
Advertisements
ABEV: a bird’s eye view
An overly eclectic, likely inconsequent[ial], and blatantly fo[w]l blog on life, family, literature, law, and religion.
MA
Recent Comments
MichaelAnafe on Priesthood Blessings: A Matter… MichaelAnafe on Our Dead III MichaelAnafe on Our Dead IV MichaelAnafe on My Brother’s Keeper: Goo… MichaelAnafe on BYU-Idaho and Graduate Sc… -
Recent Posts
- A Stranger, A Pilgrim: Liveblogging El Camino
- Mouths of Babes — Does Can Mean Should?
- Our Dead V: Memorial Day at St. Paul’s Cathedral
- Latent Racism, Orientalism and “Magic Underwear” in American Society and Mitt Romney’s Presidential Campaign
- Becoming a Mormon: Thinking about a Brand with Elder Ballard
Archives
- March 2013
- May 2012
- January 2012
- October 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- July 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
Links
Blogs
all-encompassingly * A Soft Answer * Bloggernacle Times * By Common Consent * Clean Cut * Defensor Veritatis (Catholic) * Ethesis * Green Mormon Architect * Headlife * Heart Issues for LDS (Evangelical) * Hopolios * Keepapitchinin * Kulturblog * Lehi's Library * Mormanity * Our Thoughts * Peter Priestertum * Radio Beloved * Salt Lake Architecture * Times and Seasons * Two Sticks (Jewish) * Velska's Blog
Political
U.S. Constitution * Declaration of Independence * Reflections on the Revolution in France * The Federalist Papers * The Anti-Federalist Papers * The Federalist Society * American Enterprise Institute * The Heritage Foundation * The Cato Institute * NGO Watch
International
Constitutions of the Americas * International Court of Justice * International Criminal Court
Europe
EU Constitution * European Court of Human Rights * European Court of Justice * European Parliament * European Union
Daily Reads
BBC News * CNN * Le Monde * London Times Online * National Review Online * Wall Street Opinion Journal * Die WeltUplifting Quote
Your tyranny
I was part of
Is now cracking
On every side
And your own life
Is in danger
Your empire
Is on fire
Meta
Blog Stats
- 104,834 hits
I commented on this photo where it was posted on Flickr. These are two different photos, taken by different photographers, from different countries, at different times. There is no way to draw a definitive conclusion regarding their respective intentions.
Posted by CJ
Very interesting. It’s amazing how the press can tweak a few words and totally change one’s perspective of the situation.
Posted by David H. Sundwall
CJ, I am a little confused by your comment.
Posted by john fowles
That may well be, CJ, but I still find it very interesting. If it’s not blatant racism, it’s at least a great exercise in how the way things are reported can change our perception.
Posted by Jordan
Jordan,
In my commment I merely meant to point out that the photos alone are not sufficient to give us any true understanding as to what happened in the two scenarios. It’s entirely possible that the captions are 100% accurate, or that they’re 100% inaccurate. Making any insinuations whatsoever of racism or bias (conscious or unconscious) is presumptuous.
Posted by CJ
This post has been removed by the author.
C’est vrai. That’s why I was careful to point out that they were “seemingly identical” situations.
Posted by Jordan
Fair enough. I just wanted to note that we shouldn’t assume anything specific or conclusive, given that what data we have to work with is far from complete. It’s entirely possible that what is mentioned is what happened, or vice versa.
Posted by CJ
What is interesting is not the black/white but the difference in different shades of skin. As has been noted, the areas the storm hit were from 67% to 90% black — so that blacks are going to dominate any group of pictures.
Sigh. We need to care for those amoung us, especially the poorest and most vulnerable.
Posted by Stephen M (Ethesis)
I would say that my daughter’s best friend is black, and she gets a vastly different level of treatment than my blond haired, company sweetheart, rifle team commander daughter.
The photographer who wrote the captions explained his rationale on a journalism website, It made sense after he did that.
Below from Poynter.org, (poynter is a well known and respected organization that promoted ethics in media)
“Chris Graythen wrote the caption for his photo of two hurricane survivors with bread and soda. “I believed in my opinion, that they did simply find them, and not ‘looted’ them in the definition of the word,” he writes. “The people were swimming in chest deep water, and there were other people in the water, both white and black. I looked for the best picture. there were a million items floating in the water – we were right near a grocery store that had 5+ feet of water in it. it had no doors. the water was moving, and the stuff was floating away. These people were not ducking into a store and busting down windows to get electronics. They picked up bread and cokes that were floating in the water. They would have floated away anyhow.””
Posted by porter rockwell
You may want to check your image Jordan.
Posted by Kim Siever–>